That's an interesting question, which I didn't expect to be asked.
As soon as we publish a report that dispels certain myths or sets the record straight, we're often accused of having misunderstood certain things and of having a grudge against a particular sector, which is not at all the case.
As I mentioned to Mr. Masse, if we had to do it over again, we would probably have a slightly different communications strategy. We would say that we aren't criticizing the merits of the policy itself or quantifying it. So we'd make that part clearer. Instead, we'd address the analysis of government's claim that government investments would be repaid in less than five years. That was the primary purpose of the report, not to comment on the policy itself.