I'm not sure about that.
I'd like to point out one example of why we think our approach is reasonable, much more so than the government's. For example, when the subsidies to Volkswagen were announced, we saw what happened to the Stellantis plant. They downed tools and stopped construction until they were given similar treatment.
That's why we did not want to include or suppose or assume that all these other nodes that don't exist yet or are nascent would be created without subsidies. The Trillium Network is clear that they will very likely need subsidies to the tune of 20% to 30%. We saw with Stellantis that they wanted similar treatment to what Volkswagen had.
It would be very difficult for us to include the potential impacts of plants and subsidies that are not known by anybody yet.