Our recommendation is actually twofold. We feel that adding a preamble is a step in the right direction. It refers to international instruments and all sorts of things. You can look to the preamble in case of ambiguity, even if it doesn't have the binding force of a provision of a statute. So we recommended amending the preamble, but we also recommend amending section 5, which deals with the purpose of the act.
In the Federal Court of Appeal's decision in the case involving Google, where the application of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act was at issue, the court explicitly said that it was in the purpose statement of a statute that the intent of the legislator could best be seen. So, yes, it's important that section 5 be amended.