I think you'd have to put your last question to the minister to find out why he accepted certain recommendations and not others. To be clear, he did say in his letter that he was open to looking at others, further to the committee's proceedings. Beyond that, I can't speculate.
As for providing additional opinions, I would be glad to help the committee however I can be of service, whether it's commenting on proposed amendments or meeting with the committee again, later in the study, to answer other questions. It would be my pleasure.