Now, 18 months after the minister introduced this bill, this flawed and broken bill, he's finally admitted after all of this process that it's a broken bill and he has to amend it eight times at fairly fundamental things.
I'll ask you on this issue of fundamental right what you believe about simply putting it in proposed section 5 on a parallel. Proposed section 5 is the most important section of the bill, because it supposedly says in the bill, when the amendment gets tabled, that protection of privacy is a fundamental right and that an organization basically has the right to use that data.
It appears to me that in proposed section 5, which is the thing that sets out the whole purpose of everything else in the bill, personal privacy is treated as being of equal importance to its use by a commercial entity.
Is that true?