What we want is for the courts to say that a decision that comes out of the tribunal is one they are prima facie going to respect.
At the moment, when the commissioner issues a decision, the courts start from scratch. They have the ability to start from the beginning, which is why we see.... The case of Cambridge Analytica has already been referenced a couple of times today. We still have Cambridge Analytica before the Canadian courts. We had the commissioner, then we had a first court decision, and now we have an appeal ongoing.
These are long processes and the courts play out potentially somewhat differently than the administrative side in terms of privacy itself. It's more about having the process of the Privacy Commissioner and the tribunal better respected by courts, especially given the kinds of penalties we're envisioning. I think we can well assume that, if the penalties are significant, we're going to see organizations that are facing those penalties appealing the decision through the courts.