When the minister first came to committee and suggested a whole raft of changes, and then indicated that the government was not prepared to provide the actual text of those amendments until clause-by-clause, to me, that broke the hearings. It broke them for my fellow witnesses and for the many witnesses to come. We follow closely.... The idea that you can come before a committee and comment intelligently when you don't have the actual text of the legislation means to me that everybody's time is being wasted a bit, because you're basically commenting on an old bill, rather than where things are headed.
I'm glad there are now some amendments there, but obviously we're carrying on. We don't have the specific language around the AIDA. Also, as I mentioned in my opening remarks, even around the issue of the fundamental right to privacy, I think we can still do better.