Thank you very much.
I agree with Professor Geist's initial responses, but let me just take a step back.
There are certainly specific clauses of the bill that could be amended to improve the protection of children and minors. However, we need to consider the structure of the bill as a whole in protecting children—and adults, for that matter.
Several witnesses—not only Professor Scassa and Professor Bennett—spoke about the interaction between the legitimate interest exception and the implied consent provisions of this bill. When they are applied to minors, structurally speaking, those exceptions could be very problematic. I think we need a structural approach to this. All of these pieces of this bill interact together.
What are the exceptions to consent? What are the situations in which someone collecting or using data has to go through a process to justify that? That's a data protection impact assessment. What are the remedies?
Specifically, there are a few things I would like to highlight, which I think are easy amendments, relatively speaking. The first is the “best interest of the child” language, and that could be inserted into—