I think the amendment is important because it will influence the interpretation of all subsequent provisions of the bill.
Including language that says the best interests of the child need to be taken into consideration throughout the interpretation of the subsequent provisions means that if you're doing a legitimate interest analysis, that's going to impact that analysis by the company or other organization that's collecting and processing children's data.
That's a very good thing, and it's in line with what's happening internationally. This is a provision that we see in the U.K. It's in the California legislation. I expect to see this internationally in other jurisdictions as well.