Thank you very much, Mr. Savard-Tremblay.
It would normally be Mr. Masse's turn, but he had to leave a little early. He agreed to give me his time. So, I'm going to take this opportunity to ask you a few questions, too.
I'll just echo some of the concerns my colleague Mr. Van Bynen has raised about consent fatigue and also what Mr. Perkins talked about when it comes to the Zoom contract, where the terms can be changed at the discretion of the organization.
In my mind, consent, when it comes to online activities, is a bit overrated, because there is such a big imbalance in power between the user and the organization. We cannot say that there is a meeting of the minds when privacy lawyers don't even bother to read the terms. I'm a lawyer. I haven't practised in a while, but I don't read the terms, and we need to use these apps in our day-to-day lives.
This is what, to me, the role of the legislator is: to strike that balance for consumers, kind of like in a landlord and tenant situation, where the terms are very clearly defined. I gather from your interventions that this balance has not been struck in this bill. What would be absolutely essential for us to strike that balance?
Go ahead, Mr. Hatfield.