If I've misunderstood anything, please let me know.
Number one, I am very empathetic to the concerns of small and medium-sized businesses when it comes to the level of compliance. That is part of the reason it is very important that we harmonize wherever possible, because part of the challenge with compliance is the degree to which there is nuance.
Let me just give you a very small example. Right now, if you look at AI law alone that is bubbling up in different jurisdictions, you have the EU, which has a robust law. Then you have Canada, and you have different jurisdictions as well. You have China, Singapore...a number are considering laws. Then, in the U.S. alone, there are 200 bills that were tabled from the city level to the federal level, so to the extent that we can minimize the complexity of compliance, we are far better off.
When it comes to the kinds of enforcement measures that you find in AIDA, one of the most striking to me is the criminality component, which I am most concerned about, because it does set us apart as an outlier. We don't see that in other laws around the world. I would recommend striking that, to be honest. Get rid of the criminality component, and really align AIDA, from an enforcement and a penalty perspective, as closely as possible with other leading jurisdictions.
I hope I fully answered your question.