I wanted to clarify as well.
Your original motion called for the committee to order the full unredacted contract. I think my colleague Mr. Sorbara made a good point: He clarified that unredacted copies that you can see in camera, or in a room, are very different from redacted copies that you'd see in public. I'm just wondering whether your original motion is calling for something that, to me, can't happen, which is full unredacted contracts in committee.
What I'm asking is.... If they're viewed in public, they will have to be redacted. We were trying to offer you the opportunity to see the least redactions possible in camera, so that you could get answers to your questions. That's a good-faith effort. There would still be some redactions, of course, but there would be fewer than what you'd get if you had a redacted copy in public.
I'm just clarifying. I think we've had a good conversation about this, but we were trying to offer more. If you want these contracts in public, they're going to have to be more heavily redacted. We know there are some limitations to what can be out there that's commercially sensitive, so we have to be responsible about this with the tone that Mr. Van Bynen talked about.
I just want to clarify what you're actually looking for here. Would you accept a public version that's redacted?