Yes. I know that you've been discussing this notion of legitimate interest. When we hear “legitimate interest”, it sounds like a free pass to do whatever we want, but I want to emphasize that if you look carefully at the CPPA, there is always an aspect of assessment, of explaining why we can actually rely on legitimate interest.
The fact that we are limiting.... For instance, for influencing the decision, we don't want to use legitimate interest. That's what we have at the moment in the law. I think it's a mistake, because the influence could be bad or it could be good. I will give you an example. For instance, my children are online on social media. They can see targeted advertising, contextual, without any context, regarding alcohol or something I don't necessarily like as a parent. I'd prefer for them just to have specific tailor-made advertising for children. That's what I'd prefer. I think legitimate interest could be used.
I think this is the perfect segue between legitimate interest and children. I think those are topics that you've been discussing a lot lately, as I understand. I think potentially legitimate interest is not evil. I think it's a question of documentation. I'm going to give you the word that we use in Europe: legitimate interest comes with LIA, legitimate interest assessment. This is a document, a report, explaining why and how you are relying on these legal pieces. I think the same could be done here.