I'm going to emphasize the obvious. I'm here in my personal capacity, to start.
The second aspect is that what you are showing at the moment is the limits of consent. That's what it is. It's essentially showing a big chunk of text and expecting the individual to consent. That's the reason exemptions to consent are interesting, because you will actually focus on the important moment of a data flow. Essentially, if you want an express consent on biometric data, then you're going to ask for consent.
Those kinds of things potentially could have been, in my personal view, captured by the notion of legitimate interest. If the regulator, the OPC, has any questions, then it can knock on the door and ask, “Why are you doing this? Show us the assessment.”
That's the reason why consent, to me, is not necessarily the solution. It's not bad. I think, globally, there's a consensus. Everyone understands consent. We like the notion. I think it sounds good. At the same time, it has limits. If we want meaningful consent, then we should focus on express consent in limited situations. Otherwise, we will spend our time consenting and not meaningfully consenting. I think this is my—