Thanks, Mr. Chair.
It's important to note that with respect to the billion-dollar Liberal-Green slush fund, the Auditor General had given it a clean bill of health up to 2017. While I am interested in the documents from 2015 forward, I think that some of that has already been pronounced upon by the Auditor General. Irrespective of who appointed any of the individuals to other OIC appointments and who appointed them to the board, it doesn't matter who appointed you: If you break the rules, then you need to be held to account for that.
Ms. Verschuren was in fact appointed to the SDTC billion-dollar Green slush fund by the current Liberal government and has resigned in disgrace, so in terms of conflict of interest, the government review that they commissioned has determined that the conflict of interest policies were not followed. I think it's very important that for that period of time they reviewed, to Mr. Lemire's point, that's the period of time for which we see those recusals. The in-house counsel, the one who is advising them on conflicts of interest, was the same one who told board members to backdate their conflict of interest documents. The documents they have are highly suspicious at best.
Certainly, to go back to 2015, there is full support from me for that suggestion.