Well, I think it's a recommendation based on our relationships in the community. I prefaced my remarks earlier by saying that we don't pretend to be a body that is expert in the discipline of human rights, per se. We were invited to come this morning, and I'm very happy to have the opportunity. In our relationships with different elements of the Canada-Chinese community, we have found that there are points of divergence in terms of how we engage China, as I'm sure there are points of divergence in many other communities when governments like ours interface with America, Australia, Europe, or Africa. It's stronger than a reminder. It's also to let you know, based on our relationships, that yes, there are elements in the Canada-Chinese community that would applaud a very hardline approach. There are other elements that are not convinced that this is the way we're going to meet with success, not only in furthering the cause of human rights, but in cementing a bond with a growing political and economic power when it is in the interest—in the vested interest—of Canada to enjoy a good relationship with China.
That does not mean always agreeing. It actually means that it allows us to disagree in a mature way without anyone paying the penalty or the price. That's what we want. And we're saying that there's that element in the Canada-Chinese community today, based on our relationships and dealings with that community.