Mr. Chairman, that was the initial objection that was raised in December, that more time was needed. I concurred at the time, and we're now talking about four months later. It is not as if no notice was given, nor was supporting documentation not provided at the time.
Mr. Khan may not have been a member at the time and did not have that information, which I have provided to him now. But as I said, that was circulated then.
I took the position then that I concurred with the views of this committee that they wanted more time to address it and that they wanted to hear witness testimony. So I think that four months later we have had time to consider and we have had the witness testimony.