I still feel that the previous question wasn't answered totally, because there is as well the part about the possibility of using offshore development assistance as a tool in promoting human rights and democracy.
Yes, I agree with Mr. Broadbent that it's quite difficult on a bilateral basis to interlink business and economic cooperation with human rights and democracy, but the official development assistance is the best tool, where we not only can, but when we have to, interlink these two fields. This may be exactly the way to help in countries such as Cuba in fields where really it's necessary to help deliver the financial support or other support directly to the population, not to the regime.
So I would like to encourage you to think as well about maybe extending the official development assistance to Cuba, but designed according to you, designed in accordance with the protection of human rights and to focus it on the people in need in Cuba.
What I would maybe discuss is, if the elimination or some restriction of the official development assistance is the way to promote human rights, I would say, in the opposite way, extend this cooperation with the country and deliver this assistance more to the people directly, to the local communities, and to support the civil society in the fields where the civil society feels the need to be supported.