All right. If it was given proper notice, it's certainly in order.
I'll level with you. I have not really studied this to any extent. I look at the motion, and it has the event that took place and what led to this motion. Again, I have some concerns when the Government of Canada is publicly expressing to another government its displeasure at not releasing a report. I have no other information as to why it wasn't released. Was it an internal document? Were all those things part of it? I haven't had the opportunity to really look into this.
Other motions have come before our committee as well that have expressed profound frustration with other governments, other sovereign governments, in internal matters. This certainly goes beyond being an internal matter. It's human rights. It's an atrocity.
But as for the specifics of why it wasn't released, this just says we express our profound disagreement with not releasing the report. I'm not prepared to vote on that, because I don't know any other information other than that the report wasn't released. Do we have other documents? Was this brought out of a news story?
I'll ask Madame St-Hilaire what moved her to bring this motion to this committee.