I think, Mr. Chair, with all due respect here, that she's probably got good wording on it. She's said that Canada use “appropriate” diplomatic means. It's not just diplomatic means, but that which would be appropriate to express publicly. So there may be some venue here, in fact, that in some ways gives me more confidence in this motion than just saying that Canada use diplomatic means to express publicly. I think she's used a good word, putting in “appropriate”, because there may be some measures that diplomacy would view as being appropriate and others not.
On June 5th, 2007. See this statement in context.