I'll ask another question.
Mr. Marston brought up the certificates. And again, that was a measure that was put in to protect our country, to protect the security of our country. It was a measure that was needed, that police forces were asking for, that so many different groups were asking for. One of the reasons we don't extradite some people is that we've signed conventions that say we will not extradite to a country where they will be tortured.
My question is, does our signing this supplementary protocol in any way tie the hands of governments in what they can do in a case similar to the certificates? In a case where we're talking about national security or in a case where, through intelligence-gathering agencies, they may be suspect, and we can't extradite them because of this, would this other protocol do the same thing in any manner?