Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thanks to all of you.
I'm going to continue in the same vein as my colleague. You've taught us some very interesting things this morning. You're suggesting that subcommittee members keep the pressure on the Chinese government. I'd like to take you a little further. We don't deny the fact that keeping up the pressure might be a good idea, but I'm not sure that would achieve any concrete effects.
You referred to Mr. Harper's major statement. If he wants to be credible internationally, he'll have to continue in that direction. Should that go so far as a boycott of the Olympic Games by the Canadian team? I'd like to hear what you have to say on that subject.
Also, some of you have told us that we should completely cut off dialogue with China. Others have told us we should modify it. Mr. Elliott, among others, you said that wasn't a good idea. You seem to think that we should get the NGOs more involved. Lastly, other witnesses told us that things should be done between governments for them to have an impact.
Can you clarify your remarks? This has to be clear for subcommittee members. Do we maintain bilateral dialogue with China? If so, how? We would of course involve Tibet.