If I may, I'll comment on both briefly.
The Canadian Labour Congress, together with some Canadian NGOs, try their best to track the activities of Canadian corporations in China. There are also international organizations of trade unions on a sectoral basis, and a number of those track. For example, in the mining sector there is an international organization of trade unions that tracks companies. There is one for metal workers. A number of these international sectoral organizations of global union federations have committees that monitor and discuss policies on China and monitor the activities of multinational corporations. I'd be happy to provide more information.
On the other point, you're correct in detecting cynicism. In fairness to the people in the human rights division of Foreign Affairs, they eventually gave in to our pressure to start a review of the dialogue and accepted to have Professor Burton produce a report on the situation. It was a welcome thing and a good first step.
On the suggestion that it somehow constitutes consultation, my simple answer is no. The coalition will now need to pursue the issue, not only with Foreign Affairs but with others, to see what happens to the report and how we can now begin to develop a better process for dialogue.