I don't want to be misunderstood. I am not opposed to the subcommittee producing a report, on the contrary. However, I read Mr. Pistor's draft, and I am not sure that it reflects all of the consultations by the subcommittee. I consulted my colleague who was there at that time, and I have reached the conclusion that some witnesses are not mentioned in the document. I get the impression that the report is somewhat biased.
I know that it is only a first draft, but I am not sure that all the witnesses who were heard by the previous subcommittee are there. I was not there at that time and I just want to ensure that all the testimony will be taken into consideration.