Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
And thank you, Lieutenant-Commander, for taking the time to be with us today.
In response to a question just a moment ago, I think you said that the right thing would be for the United States to regard Mr. Khadr as a victim and to focus on his rehabilitation. But in your prepared presentation you said that if Omar is to receive genuine due process at this point, it can only happen if he faces justice under Canadian law. If your position is that there's no incriminating evidence and that he should in fact simply be put into a program of rehabilitation, why are you also at the same time suggesting that he could or should face justice under Canadian law; and what would constitute the justice that he would face?