What I can say is that in addition to the most serious charge Omar is facing, the murder charge, there are a number of other charges at issue in the military commission based on other less culpable conduct. As Omar Khadr's attorney, it certainly would not be appropriate for me to point the government in the direction of a way to convict my client of a crime. But what I can say is that there are certainly other acts, other factual issues, that could be the basis for prosecution.
The larger point is that I can't offer you a predetermined outcome. Guantánamo Bay does that. What we're asking for is due process. So if there is evidence that Omar Khadr committed an offence of some kind, whether or not it was murder--and again, I don't believe it was murder--then what we would ask is that Omar receive the same process as any other Canadian would receive: a prosecutor looks at the file, a prosecutor looks at the evidence and makes a charging decision, and a court takes his age and other factors into consideration and arrives at an appropriate sentence. Again, I don't know what the ultimate outcome would be, but we're asking that he receive the same treatment as any other citizen would receive.