I will try to answer your first question, and Mr. Waldman would perhaps answer the second one.
Canada has an obligation pursuant to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Optional Protocol regarding the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict. As he was 15 years old when the things that he is accused of occurred, clearly he should have the protection that Canadian law provides for children. Canadian laws have provided for such issues and given additional protection to children. This does not mean that he could not be found guilty or taken to court, but he should be given specific protection. I think that Canadian law already provides for this.