To answer your second question...I'm sorry, I'm going to do it in English. I apologize.
The Youth Criminal Justice Act would apply as it would in the case of any person under the age of 18 who was charged in Canada with an offence. It's interesting to look at the declaration of principles of the Youth Criminal Justice Act. It says it's intended to prevent crime by addressing the circumstances underlying a young person's offending behaviour, rehabilitating a young person but, at the same time, ensuring that people are brought to justice and are treated in a manner that's consistent with the crimes they've committed.
So the law in Canada that would apply would be the Youth Criminal Justice Act. What would happen is this. Let's say Mr. Khadr is brought back to Canada and is charged with an offence--and there are offences. For example, depending on the evidence, he might be charged under section 83.18 of the Criminal Code, participating or facilitating in terrorist activity. He would then be brought before a youth court judge. The government could say, “Mr. Khadr was 15 and these are exceptional circumstances; we think he should be tried as an adult.”
But the key thing is, in compliance with our international obligations under the child soldier convention, before we make a determination as to whether he should be treated as an adult or a child, a judge has to review the special circumstances of the case and decide whether it's appropriate. That didn't happen in Guantanamo. From the moment Omar was arrested, he's been treated as an adult. He was detained in adult facilities, he was interrogated as if he were an adult, and he's being tried now as an adult. At no point has anyone in this process looked at the fact that he's a youth and decided whether it's appropriate. That's what our criminal justice system would require.