I have just a small point.
As I mentioned at the beginning of our remarks, Amnesty International has been campaigning on this case since his initial capture in 2002. One of the things we raised in the context of this case and in the cases of other people who were before the initial military commission was the question of whether it was appropriate for them to be before a military tribunal, regardless of who they were and what they were charged with, given that a number of them were either child combatants or civilians. The alternative, which doesn't seem to be in play here, has to do with jurisdiction within the U.S., including the U.S. federal courts, which I mentioned before.
The reason we're asking for repatriation now is because the U.S. shows no interest in transferring this case or any other case to the jurisdiction that does in fact meet international standards for fair trials and that can accommodate some of the juvenile justice issues. If that were in play, we would be having a different conversation. But it simply does not appear to be in play at all.