What will happen if the Canadian government doesn't intercede? Well, as part of my testimony I argued that Canada faces a choice here. A do-nothing choice, according to the scenario I paint, undermines not only what we have developed in terms of the protection of children but also the whole notion of responsibility to protect. We are undermining that. That is what a do-nothing choice is: it's not a do-nothing position but a negative position, and that grows. The longer this case goes on, the more international attention it gets.
We also have a choice to show positive leadership, and I would hope that would be the path that Canada would choose.
I don't know as we have a real choice to do nothing. We are right now trending toward being very negative, and I think the Canadian public increasingly understands that as well and wants to see Canada do something to uphold protection of children's rights.