We'd need a lot more time and a closer examination of the details of the case to go into that. When I said that he was not exceptional, I was highlighting that there are child soldiers in many different situations. Yes, Beah is one. You can look at northern Uganda and you can look at Sri Lanka, and there are differences, but how they are similar and why this is precedent-setting is that we are trying to change the way these cases are treated. In that sense, I think this one sets a precedent. It isn't so apart from all the others that it isn't going to be seen as a precedent—it is. So that's what I mean when I say it is not exceptional.
I'm arguing that there needs to be a very specific plan to deal with this case to look at the particular circumstances and particular context. We have to do that in other countries as well. Sometimes children can go home to their families, and sometimes they can't, for various reasons. If it's not in the best interests of the child to go home to his family, then there needs to be an alternative care plan. That's why the first point that I highlighted for you was about the best interests of the child; that's where we start when we talk about these cases.
So it may be that it is or isn't in his best interests to go home to his family, but that's where you start with a careful assessment, and then you develop the reintegration plan and implement it.