Right.
There is a similarity in our philosophy regarding bringing in the protocol, because “child soldiers” is really still a fairly new phenomenon, since the late eighties in Mozambique, and so on. We have a weapon here that we're actually trying to neutralize on the battlefield called a child soldier.
The reason not to go after them under age 18 is similar to the reason for which I created a rule in my force to not fraternize; it's that there is no such thing as consenting adults in a country in conflict. The women do not fall in love automatically with the uniform; they're doing it for money, for their family, for protection, from fear, for food, and so on. There is no such thing as fraternization or consenting adults in a conflict zone.
These children are in a similar sort of ethical scenario, which we must be prepared to respond to.