Thank you so much.
It's important to note that what the Supreme Court did was totally rely on the U.S. Supreme Court decision of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, which came out in July 2006. Literally, prior to 2006, Guantanamo was illegal, according to the United States and Canadian supreme courts.
The U.S. Congress swiftly moved to pass the Military Commissions Act in 2006, prior to the congressional mid-term elections, before they lost the Congress. We know that the Military Commissions Act still gleans information from the detainees through a course of measures. We know that it provides for the evidence to be gleaned from hearsay. And last February, after our research was published, more than 34 law societies from around the world called the Guantanamo process an affront to the rule of law and called upon the Prime Minister to seek custody of Omar Khadr.
What the Supreme Court did was put the onus on the government, and the assertion they used was that he was being treated humanely, so let's deal with the legal process there. It clearly puts the onus on providing what legal basis we have to continue that incarceration and to let that trial proceed.