Maybe I could make one other observation.
The first thing is that we agree with you completely that repatriation doesn't equal impunity. It's not that Mr. Khadr will be repatriated and there will be no prospect of criminal charges or other measures being taken against him. I know that parlance has been out there. The motivation for writing this report was to query and test that assumption, and we find it has no truth to it.
I will add that on top of the prospect of criminal prosecution, there are provisions in our criminal law, known colloquially as peace bonds, one of which is found in section 810.01 of the Criminal Code in relation to terrorism offences. It permits a court, in circumstances where the government has reasonable fear to believe a person may engage in terrorism offences, to impose conditions on their behaviour. We're seeing these peace bonds used in relation to some of the individuals in that subset of the Toronto 18, who have now been released subject to peace bonds. There are restrictions on their behaviour, who they can associate with, curfews, etc. So there are measures short of criminal prosecution that would be available for the Government of Canada were it inclined, not necessarily to prosecute Mr. Khadr, but to impose some restrictions on his behaviour were he repatriated.
I raise that with you just so you are aware of it.