With respect to the issue of consular services, there was domestic practice that afforded Omar Khadr those types of services that a Federal Court judge found to be in violation and ordered, on that regard, an injunction against further interrogation. That's the authority for that issue.
With respect to the issue of further actions on the Canadian government and whether that is supported by the Supreme Court's recent decision, whether the source is the charter or Canada's international legal obligations, yes, I think you're right, and most people would agree, that you can make an argument for positive obligations, for more actions by the Canadian government. Professor Forcese has pointed out that as a matter of international legal law people might disagree, but that politically and morally there have been precedents from all of our allies in that regard.
So the decision is going to be debated, the decision that came out on Friday, but at minimum, yes, the Supreme Court unanimously is saying that he is afforded disclosure rights in order to meet the case against him. And I think as Canadians we would view that type of right as much better exercised in Canada under our justice system, under due process, recognized by all citizens, regardless of political ideology.