I have a question, and then I'll give the rest of my time to Mr. Kenney, because I haven't been here. But I did go through our previous witnesses' testimony.
I always want to make sure we frame the argument in full, with all of its complexities. Mr. Khadr is facing very serious charges with the murder of a medic and the blinding of a sergeant 1st class. Even in our own Youth Criminal Justice Act there is a provision that if a crime is particularly heinous, and this has happened on our soil, a youth can be tried as an adult.
I'll read this previous testimony, which I wasn't here for, but I have it documented.
I'll read some of it back to you and then get your comment, Mr. Raghubeer. It reads:
So the idea that a soldier under the age of 18 can never really be a soldier and the claim that a 15 year old is not capable of genuinely consenting to serve are directly refuted by the text of the only applicable international instrument.
When Lt.-Cdr. Kuebler says that “children are never soldiers, they are children”, or General Dallaire says that “no one is allowed to use young people under the age of 18 in any way whatsoever,” their opinions are flatly contradicted by the official position of the United Kingdom, the UN Security Council, and the text of both the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children....
I'd like you to comment on those comments that were made one hour before you, Mr. Raghubeer.