Let me come back to the fact that you referred to Mr. Khadr as not being a "gentleman", implying that he should not receive the same respect that a "gentleman" would receive.
It is also true that no one brought to trial is really a "gentleman" as generally understood. Your definition could be very different from mine. It is completely subjective, and I would go as far as to say that your comment is inappropriate.
I would like to know the following. There has been a lot of comment about the Khadr family, some of whom are terrorists, at least the father was. Do you think that it is fair for the child to be judged by what his father has said? Do you not think that he is a completely separate human being and that, as a child, he has the right to be protected by his country of birth?