Thank you.
I appreciate that you brought up responsibility to protect. I didn't bring it up, and I think it's something that bears mentioning in this context. This is a perfect example of where R2P, responsibility to protect, comes into play. As I said, all the red flags are there, all the warning signs are there, and we're not living up to the R2P principles.
The other point you made that I think is very good is the fact that Ahmadinejad is not alone. I've been asked why we should prosecute him. Why focus on Ahmadinejad when you have all these other people, including the supreme leader, who make these statements? My response is that Ahmadinejad has been the most vocal. He has been the most visible.
One of the aspects of criminal law, whether it's domestic criminal law or international criminal law, is deterrence. You make the most effective statement if you prosecute Ahmadinejad as opposed to one of the others, because he is the one who is most associated with this. He is the one who has embraced it the most fervently. I think, if the world sees that the international community is not going to put up with this anymore, it will send the most powerful message out there possible.
I agree with you that he's the one we should be focusing on, despite the fact that we could find others, or maybe we could even charge it as a conspiracy. I think it's more effective to single him out. I really do. I think we'd get more bang for the buck.