If I could just pursue that a tiny bit further, I'm just thinking that from the perspective of a country that has a limited number, in the foreseeable future, of actually deliverable warheads, the accuracy you're describing would leave me with some alarm if I were then considering using these missiles for a target where..... Tel Aviv is, after all, only nine kilometres from the West Bank.
Obviously, this is all outside the moral calculations. It's all repugnant. But you'd be now dealing with a severe public relations problem if you were trying to demonstrate that you're the leaders of the Muslim world and you were putting Muslim populations at risk of—I don't know what you'd call it—a kind of friendly fire. That's just a thought.
The other question I had, and this was raised a bit in one of the earlier questions, is about the fear of a Velvet Revolution. I had the thought that even paranoids have real enemies. One thought that has occurred to me as we've gone through these hearings and listened to our witnesses is that there are a large number of groups of people--most of the surrounding countries, most of the linguistic minority populations within Iran, the religious minorities, be they non-Muslim or non-Shia minorities, intellectuals, students, those who are not the beneficiaries of corruption--who have reason to want the regime to be replaced or who would legitimately expect that they would benefit if a regime other than the current one were in place.
Given that situation—again, I'm editorializing more than asking a question, but you can comment on my editorial--it strikes me that there actually is reason for someone who is in a position of power in Iran to worry not only that they might find themselves out of power, but that a Velvet Revolution would be a very desirable outcome, as compared to, say, the outcome of the Ceausescu regime in Romania, which fell equally swiftly but also met with a rather dire end.