I think it's been renumbered. I think it's now Bill S-233.
In any event, the preamble of this bill enunciates the principle that also animates our request. It essentially recognizes that these peremptory norms of international law are superior in the hierarchy to other inferior norms, such as state immunity. When a conflict occurs between these norms, the peremptory norms should trump the inferior norm of state immunity.
Then they go on, essentially codifying an amendment to the State Immunity Act for terrorism, on the basis that terrorism is a violation of peremptory norms of international law. It's the same principle, really, and that formula, that spirit, can also embody the bill we would be putting forward for torture, crimes against humanity, war crimes, genocide, terrorism, extrajudicial killing. These are the no-brainers at international law. These wrongful acts are vastly recognized as being illegal and against international public order.