That's right.
This could generate a huge discussion in itself, but there are many reasons why this might have occurred. One is maybe that it was deemed wise to proceed step by step. It is quite rare in fact that conventions are implemented wholesale, that every section of a convention or treaty is implemented wholesale. It is quite often done, particularly in human rights cases, on a piecemeal approach. Sometimes it's because it is thought that Canadian law already provides the necessary protection that is required from the treaty. However, this is not the case with article 14 of the convention against torture. There is no explicit implementation on that obligation to provide a civil remedy for torture.