Certainly we looked at that piece of legislation and we have talked about whether it's a matter of adding these crimes, because they are on exactly the same level. The crimes of terrorism, of course, have been very much in the public eye since September 11 globally, and I think it's the reason these very specific attempts have moved more quickly. These other atrocities, obviously, are equally serious.
In a way it's a question for you. One of the questions we've had is whether that process, the attempt to provide a definition of terrorism, is so challenging it will create challenges in the legislation. It was one of the things we wondered, because I know that attempt to provide the definition internationally has been very challenging. We had wondered, do we keep it clear and separate and do a process that's specifically about another set of international crimes? Perhaps you could advise us.