No, that's not what we're saying. We're saying that but for the State Immunity Act, there is no question that the case could and should proceed before the Quebec courts.
On April 30th, 2009. See this statement in context.
On April 30th, 2009. See this statement in context.
Lawyer, Irving Mitchell Kalichman, As an Individual
No, that's not what we're saying. We're saying that but for the State Immunity Act, there is no question that the case could and should proceed before the Quebec courts.
See context to find out what was said next.