Perhaps I can comment.
Mr. Marston, firstly, thank you very much for your support on the issue.
You mentioned the complicity of Canada. Let me add a little piece to this interesting puzzle, if I may, particularly with respect to the case of Mr. Buzari.
The State Immunity Act provides a way in which foreign countries can be served with a claim, interestingly, and we served Iran through the State Immunity Act and Iran didn't defend. We went to court and what happened was that the Government of Canada intervened in the lawsuit, hired experts from England at huge cost, brought them into the court room and argued the position that Iran would have argued, had Iran defended the case. We fought in the Buzari case against the Government of Canada.
To be objective about it, the Government of Canada was simply upholding its own statute, the State Immunity Act, but there was a certain irony about that, where Mr. Buzari, who had chosen Canada as his home, had become a citizen of Canada and was now facing the Government of Canada in his quest for justice. What the Government of Canada should have done was taken steps to amend the State Immunity Act.
I wanted to add that piece to your puzzle.