We are almost at the end of our meeting. I have one very brief question as a follow-up, if I may.
If I'm not mistaken, the common law principle is that the king can do no wrong. So I'm guessing that the purpose of the State Immunity Act was not to create immunities where none previously existed, but rather to create a measured way in which limited rollbacks of immunities that were there under the traditional common law rule could be created. Am I understanding things correctly?