I think that what I am proposing is not that there be a direct response by NATO of a pre-emptive sort of any kind. I would merely advocate the kind of thing Hillary Clinton said during her campaign for President, which was that if Israel were attacked, if it were subject to a nuclear attack, the response would in fact be by NATO. The reason I say that is because the United Nations does not have nuclear forces. The only deterrent force to a nuclear attack has to come from forces that have nuclear power, and the United Nations has no such power.
The reason, also, that NATO is a more appropriate responder in this case is that it won't be hampered by the veto. Right now, the United Nations has a deterrent to genocide that, I'm afraid, has been proven again and again to not be effective. That's the reason I believe we should simply be clear. I think it should be, of course, definitely multilaterally agreed to by NATO countries that NATO would respond if Israel were attacked in a nuclear attack by Iran, and they should warn the Iranians.