Thank you.
On the question about prioritization, if I can address that one, the work that we have been conducting is in fact to take a look at the 68 recommendations that have been provided. Maybe I can say that despite your reservation about some of the countries and perhaps the relevancy of some of the countries coming forward, I think that overall we were very encouraged by the calibre of the 68 recommendations that came forward from the states. Certainly they were very much worth considering.
Much of our work over the last months has been in fact to take a look at those 68 recommendations with a view that, really, the report that we want to make back to the United Nations is to frame those 68 recommendations in terms of their prioritization. That would be in terms of what the agenda will really look like for Canada, which of those recommendations are we not going to be adopting, which of the recommendations are we going to be striving for, and which ones do we intend on perhaps advancing with, but with some tweaking in terms of the way they were positioned with us.
The work that has been largely undertaken with federal government departments, with the provinces and territories, and indeed with civil society, has been to get the collective views about the importance and the relevancy of those 68 recommendations. We've asked where it would benefit Canada to actually focus its agenda, in terms of the next four-year cycle and the accountability that we will have, to report in four years on our UPR process. So that has very much been key to the work that we have undertaken.
On the second question, Adèle, do you want to address that?