That's a good point. I was about to propose a question of my own. Perhaps we can invite the witnesses back at a later date, if they're willing to come back, to ask further questions.
I did have one follow-up that I just wanted very briefly to put in here on my own. This is to Mr. Langtry.
Did I understand from your last comment that essentially you look at only the precedents that come from the courts, as opposed to looking at the previous decisions of the tribunal? Do you distinguish that way?