I would have a public hanging of Richard Warman.
While I think there's a lot to be said for abolishing human rights commissions or taking away their thought police role, there is a legitimate place for the anti-discrimination functions that date back to the Ontario Human Rights Code of 1960. The thought police role is an unnecessary adjunct.
The Criminal Code does contain an offense of wilfully promoting hatred. Let me note, for the benefit of my friend down at the end of this table, that in 2002 the Criminal Code was amended by changing section 318, so that the wilfully promoting hatred offence has been broadened. It originally applied to promoting hatred on the basis of race, religion, or national origin. The section now refers to promoting hatred on the basis of race, religion, national origin, or sexual orientation
The Criminal Code contains a prohibition against promoting hatred, which is certainly not a form of speech that deserves any protection in a democracy. The Criminal Code can do the job. It doesn't need the assistance of human rights commissions.