That is the classic example of the kind of argumentative technique used by people who support the thought police who say that if I argue in favour of free expression, I'm in favour of the persecution of Asians, Africans, and homosexuals.
I make a principled argument, sir, in favour of freedom of expression. I do not add any baggage to that argument. If you wish to read that into my argument you are free to do so, but it wasn't there.